<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>OpenStrategy Research</title>
  <subtitle>Institutional research on onchain strategy quality, evidence, and underwriting.</subtitle>
  <id>https://openstrategy.trade/research/</id>
  <link href="https://openstrategy.trade/research/feed.xml" rel="self" />
  <link href="https://openstrategy.trade/research/" />
  <updated>2026-07-29T00:09:07.343Z</updated>
  <author><name>OpenStrategy Research</name></author>
  <entry>
    <title>A 1.69% Drawdown, Then a Near-Recovery</title>
    <id>https://openstrategy.trade/research/index/weekly-note-2026-07-27/</id>
    <link href="https://openstrategy.trade/research/index/weekly-note-2026-07-27/" />
    <published>2026-07-27T00:09:06.941Z</published>
    <updated>2026-07-27T13:15:06.545Z</updated>
    <author><name>Teo Jun Hao</name></author>
    <summary>OSIQ 30 recovered to within 0.19% of its 23 July peak. The loss-and-recovery path adds evidence for evaluating Exposure Discipline and Non-Fragility over time.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Reading the OpenStrategy Institutional Quality Index</title>
    <id>https://openstrategy.trade/research/index/reading-openstrategy-institutional-quality-index/</id>
    <link href="https://openstrategy.trade/research/index/reading-openstrategy-institutional-quality-index/" />
    <published>2026-07-16T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <updated>2026-07-29T00:09:07.343Z</updated>
    <author><name>OpenStrategy Research</name></author>
    <summary>Why OSIQ 30 exists, what institutional quality means, what Index inclusion does not establish, and how to interpret the record from its 1 July 2026 inception.</summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
